

Vladimir Rybakov
Author

Snir Ahiel
Fact Checker
The best prop firm is the one whose rules match how you trade, and on that test our pick is Pipcy: no daily drawdown, no trailing drawdown, a pip-based challenge alongside the percentage-based one, news trading allowed, and a profit split that scales to 100%. Below, the six criteria that decide it and how the major firms compare.
Search "best prop firms" or "top prop firms" and you get a dozen ranked lists that mostly disagree with each other. There is a reason for that. Many of those lists are ordered by affiliate commission rather than trader outcome, and a surprising number still feature firms that shut down. In 19 years of trading and a lot of years watching this industry, I have learned that the ranking question is the wrong question. No firm is best for everyone, because the thing that decides your result is whether a firm's rules fit your strategy.
So this guide does something different. First it gives you the six criteria that actually predict whether you will pass and get paid, which is what separates the best prop trading firms from the best-marketed ones. Then it compares the major firms honestly on those criteria, including where a prop trading firm like Pipcy fits. Then it answers the question most people are really asking: which one should I start with as a beginner. This page compares firms; for a product-level comparison of the evaluations themselves, see our guide to the best funded account.
If you are new to the model entirely, start with our explainer on what a prop firm is and come back.
No single prop firm is best for every trader. The best firm for you is the one whose drawdown rules, asset coverage, and payout terms suit your strategy. Compare on six criteria: profit split, payout speed, drawdown structure, evaluation cost, markets offered, and the scaling path after funding. Rule fit beats headline numbers every time.

The mistake almost everyone makes is comparing the two numbers that are easiest to compare: the profit split and the fee. Those are the least predictive numbers on the page. A 90% split is worthless if the firm's trailing drawdown ends your account in week two, and a cheap evaluation is expensive if you have to buy it four times.
Here are the six criteria in the order they affect your outcome:
Compare prop firms by reading the rulebook before the marketing page. Check whether the drawdown is static or trailing, whether a daily loss limit applies, whether news trading is restricted, how fast payouts clear, and what the profit split is at the start rather than at the top tier. Then check independent payout reports.
Two practical habits separate a good comparison from a wasted evaluation fee.
Read the rules, not the landing page. Every firm publishes its rulebook. The landing page advertises the split; the rulebook contains the trailing drawdown, the consistency requirement, the news restriction, and the minimum trading days. That is where the passing and failing actually happens. Our guides to drawdown and trailing drawdown explain what to look for, and the guide to maximum drawdown as buying power shows how to turn the drawdown figure into a dollar comparison across firms.
Verify payouts independently. A firm's own testimonials prove nothing. Trustpilot, Reddit, and trading forums will tell you whether traders are actually being paid on time, and whether payout denials cluster around any particular firm. This is the one check that reliably filters out the operators who profit only from failed evaluations.
Across the major firms, the biggest structural differences are the drawdown rules and asset coverage, not the profit split. Most firms cluster at 80% to 90% on the split. Where they genuinely diverge is whether they impose a daily loss limit, whether the maximum drawdown trails your peak, and whether news trading is allowed.
| Firm | Market focus | Account sizes | Profit split | Daily drawdown | Trailing drawdown | News trading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pipcy | Forex + multi-asset | $2.5K to $100K | Up to 100% | None | None | Allowed |
| FTMO | Forex + multi-asset | ~$10K to $200K | 80% to 90% | Yes (5% 2-Step, 3% 1-Step) | No on 2-Step; yes, end-of-day, on 1-Step | Restricted on Standard accounts |
| The5ers | Forex | ~$6K, scaling high | 50% to 100% by programme | Yes (5% on High Stakes, ends the account) | No on High Stakes | Restricted around high-impact news |
| FundedNext | Forex + multi-asset | ~$6K to $200K | 80% to 90% | Yes (5%) | No on Stellar 2-Step | Not stated in the rulebook |
| Apex Trader Funding | Futures | ~$25K to $300K | 100% first tier, then 90% | No | Yes | Varies |
| Topstep | Futures | ~$50K to $150K | 100% first tier, then 90% | Optional (off by default) | Yes | Varies |
Competitor rules as published in each firm's rulebook or help centre as of September 2026. Terms change frequently, and several firms run permanent discounts that make list prices misleading. Treat this table as a structural comparison rather than a live price sheet, and confirm current rules on each firm's own rulebook before you buy. Pipcy's own terms are on the Pipcy Classic and Pips Mastery pages.
Read that table by column, not by row. The profit-split column is nearly identical across firms, which tells you it is a marketing lever rather than a differentiator. The two drawdown columns are where firms actually differ, and those are the columns that determine whether you keep an account.
The top prop firms split cleanly by market. FTMO, The5ers, FundedNext, and Pipcy compete in forex and multi-asset; Apex and Topstep dominate futures. Within forex, the meaningful differences are drawdown structure, news policy, payout speed, and whether the evaluation is measured in percentages or pips.
FTMO. The most recognised name in retail forex prop trading, operating since 2015 out of Prague with a large funded-trader base and a long payout history. A two-phase evaluation with a daily loss limit and a percentage-based target, plus a one-phase route with an end-of-day trailing maximum. It suits traders who want an established brand and can work inside a daily drawdown cap.
The5ers. Known for its scaling programme, which can grow accounts substantially over time, and for offering several programme types including instant-funding style routes. Splits and rules vary meaningfully between those programmes, so the specific programme matters more than the brand.
FundedNext. A newer, aggressively priced competitor in the forex space with competitive splits. Suits traders comfortable with a shorter operating history in exchange for pricing.
Apex Trader Funding. A futures specialist, popular for having no daily loss limit, though it applies a trailing drawdown instead. Frequently discounted. Relevant only if you trade futures.
Topstep. One of the longest-running futures firms, with a strong reputation. It applies a trailing maximum loss limit; the daily loss limit, once mandatory, is now an optional add-on. Strong educational material. Again, futures only.
Pipcy. Forex and multi-asset, with the structural choice that matters most in this comparison: no daily drawdown and no trailing drawdown on either challenge, plus news trading allowed, payout requests processed within 48 hours of approval, and up to a 100% split. It also offers a pip-based evaluation route alongside the conventional percentage-based one, which is uncommon.
Two honest notes on this list. Some published "best firms" lists still include firms that have collapsed or been shut down, MyForexFunds being the well-known example, shut down in 2023, so check that any list you read is current. And I am not going to tell you a competitor is your best choice, because I work at Pipcy and that would not be a claim you should trust from me. What I will do is tell you which rules to compare, so you can judge for yourself.
Drawdown rules fail more traders than profit targets do. A static maximum drawdown is fixed below your starting balance and predictable. A trailing drawdown follows your peak equity upward, so it tightens as you profit and can end an account that is still in profit. A daily loss limit can end your day on normal intraday variance.
This is the section most comparison articles skip, and it is the one that matters most.
When you compare firms, the presence or absence of these two rules tells you more about your realistic chance of success than any split percentage. A firm that removes both, as Pipcy does, gives you one fixed number to manage instead of three moving ones. For why this matters in practice, see why most traders fail prop challenges and our risk management guide.
For beginners, the best prop firm is the one with the simplest rules and the lowest cost of a failed attempt. Prioritise a static drawdown with no daily limit, a small entry-level account so a failed attempt is cheap, clear published rules, fast payouts, and free education. Avoid trailing drawdowns and complex multi-phase structures at the start.

A beginner needs different things from an experienced trader, and the best funded prop firms for a first attempt are rarely the biggest names. Experience lets you work around a restrictive rule; inexperience does not. So the beginner criteria are narrower:
Measured against that list, Pipcy is the option I would point a beginner toward, and I will be transparent that it is my firm. The reasons are structural rather than promotional: no daily drawdown, no trailing drawdown, entry from $23 so a first attempt is genuinely cheap, a 3-day minimum, news trading allowed on every challenge, payout requests processed within 48 hours of approval, and free Pipcy Academy access. The two routes are Pipcy Classic (percentage-based, multi-asset) and Pips Mastery (pip-based, forex). If you want the detail on which suits you, see Pipcy Classic vs Pips Mastery, and for the account-level view, the best funded account.
For forex traders, the best prop firms are the ones that let a currency strategy run as it was built: no daily loss limit that ends a session on one news candle, no restriction on trading through releases, a static maximum, and an evaluation measured in a unit the trader already thinks in. Multi-asset coverage is a bonus.
Forex is where most retail prop trading happens and where the rulebooks differ most. Three things decide which forex prop firm fits.
The news policy. Currency pairs move on scheduled releases, and a firm that restricts trading around them is removing the hours a forex strategy was designed for. FTMO restricts news trading on its Standard accounts; The5ers restricts entries in a window around high-impact releases; Pipcy allows news trading on every route. If your strategy trades the releases, this column decides the firm before any other.
The daily limit. A 3% to 5% daily loss limit interacts badly with forex volatility, because one wide-ranging session on a major pair can breach it on a position that is otherwise inside plan. Most forex firms enforce one. Pipcy does not, on any route, and our guide to daily vs maximum drawdown explains why that single rule ends more forex evaluations than the profit target does.
The unit of measurement. Every forex prop firm measures the evaluation in percentages of balance. Pipcy also offers a pip-based route, Pips Mastery, where the target and the loss limit are set in pips and the lot size is fixed by the account tier. For a trader who already plans in pips, that removes the sizing decision from the evaluation entirely. It is forex-only by design, which is the point.
The forex comparison therefore reduces to the same table above, read with the news and daily-limit columns first. For the account-level view of forex evaluations specifically, the best funded account guide compares seven products on those columns.
The clearest red flags are payout problems, anonymous ownership, and vague rules. Avoid firms with reports of denied or delayed withdrawals, any fee required to release your profit, no registered company or named leadership, guarantees of easy funding, and rulebooks loose enough to disqualify a profitable trader on a technicality.
The most trusted prop firms pass this filter without effort; run it before you pay anyone:
For the full trust framework, see are prop firms legit.
The best prop firm is a matching exercise, not a ranking. Compare the drawdown structure first, then payout reliability, then the split, then cost, markets, and scaling. If a firm's rules would have failed your last three months of trading, its profit split is irrelevant.
If you want the simplest rule set to trade against, Pipcy runs no daily drawdown, no trailing drawdown, news trading allowed on every challenge, payout requests processed within 48 hours of approval, and up to a 100% split through the Growth Plan. Start with Pipcy Classic for multi-asset percentage-based trading or Pips Mastery for pip-based forex, both with free Pipcy Academy access.
There is no single best prop firm, because the right choice depends on what you trade and which rules you can follow. The best firm for you has a drawdown structure your strategy can survive, verifiable payouts, a competitive split, and coverage of your markets. Compare rulebooks rather than rankings, since most published lists are ordered by commission.
For beginners, the best prop firm has simple rules and a cheap first attempt: a static drawdown with no daily limit, small entry-level accounts, plainly published rules, fast payouts, and free education. Avoid trailing drawdowns and multi-phase evaluations early on. Pipcy fits these criteria, with entry from $23, no daily or trailing drawdown, and Academy access included.
Most major firms cluster between 80% and 90%, with several advertising up to 95% or 100% on a first tier. Pipcy offers up to 100% at the top Growth Plan level. Treat the split as secondary, because a high split combined with a trailing drawdown or slow payouts is worth less than a lower split you can actually reach.
A minority of firms remove the daily loss limit. Pipcy has no daily drawdown and no trailing drawdown on either challenge, and futures firms such as Apex and Topstep omit or make optional the daily limit while applying a trailing drawdown. Since drawdown rules fail more traders than profit targets, this is the most important column to compare.
Evaluation fees typically run from around $20 for the smallest accounts to several hundred dollars for six-figure accounts, and most firms discount heavily. Budget for two or three attempts rather than one, because most traders do not pass first time. The cheapest prop firm is not automatically the best, but Pipcy's start at $23, so a first attempt stays inexpensive.
Treat them cautiously. Many rank firms by affiliate commission rather than trader outcome, and some still list firms that have shut down, such as MyForexFunds, shut down in 2023. Use lists to discover firms, then verify each one yourself against its published rulebook and independent payout reports before paying anything.
Written by Vladimir Rybakov, Head of PIPCY Academy, CFTe-certified with 19 years of trading experience.
Fact-checked by Snir Ahiel, former co-founder of The5ers and risk management specialist at Pipcy, with 15+ years trading Forex, Stocks, and Options.
Disclosure: Pipcy is the author's firm. Competitor firms are described for comparison using publicly available information at the time of writing; their terms change frequently, so verify current rules directly with each firm. Nothing here is a recommendation to use any specific competitor.
Risk disclosure: Trading involves substantial risk. Pipcy provides simulated trading evaluations for educational and assessment purposes. Simulated performance does not represent real trading results, and becoming a funded trader is not guaranteed. Nothing here is financial or investment advice.
Recent Posts
Best Prop Firms: Comparison Criteria, Firm-by-Firm Breakdown, and Beginner Picks
Sep 28, 2026
What Is Drawdown in Trading? The Complete Guide to Drawdown, Recovery, and Prop Firm Rules
Sep 28, 2026
Best Funded Account: 7 Evaluations Compared, the Rules That Matter, and Our Pick
Sep 24, 2026
Are Funded Accounts Legit? What's Real, What's a Scam, and How to Tell
Sep 18, 2026
How Do Funded Accounts Work? Capital, Profit Splits, and Payouts
Sep 17, 2026